सोमवार, 23 जुलाई 2012

BBC says about Taj Mahal—Hidden Truth – Never say it is a Tomb



Aerial view of the Taj Mahal.
ole0.jpg
The interior water well
 ole1.jpg
Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome
ole2.jpg
Close up of the dome with pinnacle
ole3.jpg
Close up of the pinnacle
ole4.jpg
Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard
ole5.jpg
Red lotus at apex of the entrance
ole6.jpg
Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments
ole7.jpg
View of sealed doors & windows in back
ole8.jpg
Typical Vedic style corridors
ole9.jpg
The Music House–a contradiction
ole10.jpg
A locked room on upper floor
ole11.jpg
A marble apartment on ground floor
ole12.jpg
The OM in the flowers on the walls
ole13.jpg
Staircase that leads to the lower levels
ole14.jpg
300 foot long corridor inside apartments
ole15.jpg
One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level
ole16.jpg
Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms
ole17.jpg
Interior of another of the locked rooms
ole18.jpg
Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room
ole19.jpg
Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks
ole20.jpg
Secret walled door that leads to other rooms
ole21.jpg
Secret bricked door that hides more evidence
ole22.jpg
Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died
ole23.jpg
Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried
ole24.jpg
NOW READ THIS…….
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court ch ronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz’s burial . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.
For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term ” Mahal ” has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria .. “The unusual explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,” he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.”Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva’s Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan’s time corroborates the love story.
Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan’s era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s death), describes the life of the cit y in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan’s time.
Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public . Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi’s government t ried to have Prof. Oak’s book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition dire consequences . There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak’s research.
Open all sealed rooms in front of media. Let experts investigate.
Source :: One forwarded email.
utkarsh-shukla.blogspot.com

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:

एक टिप्पणी भेजें

thanks for visit my blog